Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Beauford v. State

Beauford v. State

689 So. 2d 320, 1997 WL 24593
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1997
Docket96-3066
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 689 So. 2d 320 (Beauford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beauford v. State, 689 So. 2d 320, 1997 WL 24593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

689 So.2d 320 (1997)

Shironald BEAUFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-3066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 24, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1997.

Shironald Beauford, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Beauford's second Rule 3.850 motion[1]. Beauford is barred from raising issues which could or should have been raised in his first Rule 3.850 motion. This one attempts to do that and thus it is successive and improper. See Henry v. State, 679 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Scott v. State, 656 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. State
760 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Clay v. State
700 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Gregory v. State
698 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 So. 2d 320, 1997 WL 24593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beauford-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.