Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Beauford v. State

Beauford v. State

689 So. 2d 320, 1997 WL 24593
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1997·No. 96-3066·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

689 So.2d 320 (1997)

Shironald BEAUFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-3066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 24, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1997.

Shironald Beauford, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Beauford's second Rule 3.850 motion[1]. Beauford is barred from raising issues which could or should have been raised in his first Rule 3.850 motion. This one attempts to do that and thus it is successive and improper. See Henry v. State, 679 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Scott v. State, 656 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beauford v. State, 689 So. 2d 320, 1997 WL 24593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 320 (Beauford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. State
760 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Clay v. State
700 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Gregory v. State
698 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)