Beauford v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beauford v. New York City Transit Authority

254 A.D.2d 186, 679 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11136

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 1998·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 5, 1997, which granted the motion by defendant New York City Transit Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by a bus, plaintiff has sued defendant New York City Transit Authority. The bus that struck plaintiff, however, was owned and operated by the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority. Since plaintiff sued the wrong party and failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to whether that party, the New York City Transit Authority, should be estopped from denying ownership or operation of the bus (see, Nowinski v City of New York, 189 AD2d 674; Luka v New York City Tr. Auth., 100 AD2d 323, affd 63 NY2d 667), her complaint was properly dismissed. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 5, 1997, which granted the motion by defendant New York City Transit Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff when she was struck by a bus, plaintiff has sued defendant New York City Transit Authority. The bus that struck plaintiff, however, was owned and operated by the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority. Since plaintiff sued the wrong party and failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to whether that party, the New York City Transit Authority, should be estopped from denying ownership or operation of the bus (see, Nowinski v City of New York, 189 AD2d 674; Luka v New York City Tr. Auth., 100 AD2d 323, affd 63 NY2d 667), her complaint was properly dismissed. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Beauford v. New York City Transit Authority, 254 A.D.2d 186, 679 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

254 A.D.2d 186 (Beauford v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related