Beaudu v. Safeco Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beaudu v. Safeco Insurance

52 A.D.2d 898, 383 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12740

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action on an insurance policy, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 15, 1975, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. No findings of fact were presented for review. Plaintiff’s delay in commencing this action was not attributable to the alleged inequitable conduct of the defendant (see Proc v Home Ins. Co., 17 NY2d 239; Fotochrome, Inc. v American Ins. Co., 26 AD2d 634, affd 23 NY2d 889). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on an insurance policy, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 15, 1975, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. No findings of fact were presented for review. Plaintiff’s delay in commencing this action was not attributable to the alleged inequitable conduct of the defendant (see Proc v Home Ins. Co., 17 NY2d 239; Fotochrome, Inc. v American Ins. Co., 26 AD2d 634, affd 23 NY2d 889). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Beaudu v. Safeco Insurance, 52 A.D.2d 898, 383 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

52 A.D.2d 898 (Beaudu v. Safeco Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related