Beaudry v. National Bank

138 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 22, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 436
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1927
Docket18089
StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.E. 527 (Beaudry v. National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beaudry v. National Bank, 138 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 22, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When the excerpt from the charge, of which complaint is made in the motion -for a new trial, is considered in connection with the full instructions given to the jury, it shows no reason why a new trial should be granted.

■ 2. The evidence is ample to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S.E. 527, 37 Ga. App. 22, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaudry-v-national-bank-gactapp-1927.