Beaudry v. Beaudry
This text of 95 A.D.3d 808 (Beaudry v. Beaudry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Bivona, J.), entered May 5, 2011, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded him only supervised visitation with the parties’ child and awarded the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $60,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court’s determination that the defendant’s visitation with the parties’ child should be supervised is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Anwar v Sani, 78 AD3d 827, 828 [2010]; Matter of Roldan v Nieves, 76 AD3d 634, 635 [2010]; Matter of Custer v Slater, 2 AD3d 1227, 1228 [2003]).
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $60,000 (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; Anderson v Anderson, 50 AD3d 610, 611 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A.D.3d 808, 942 N.Y.S.2d 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaudry-v-beaudry-nyappdiv-2012.