Beaudoin v. State
658 So. 2d 663, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8278, 1995 WL 454004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1995·No. No. 95-1632·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
In accordance with the state’s candid and well-taken partial confession of error, the denial of rule 3.800 relief below is reversed as to the habitual offender sentence imposed upon the appellant for count three of the information, which charged a life felony. § 775.087(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); see Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). The cause is remanded for resentencing as to that count alone. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beaudoin v. State, 658 So. 2d 663, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8278, 1995 WL 454004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
658 So. 2d 663 (Beaudoin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carter v. State
786 So. 2d 1173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Weford v. State
784 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)