Beaudoin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beaudoin v. State

658 So. 2d 663, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8278, 1995 WL 454004

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 1995

DocketNo. 95-1632

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 658 So. 2d 663 (Beaudoin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaudoin v. State, 658 So. 2d 663, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8278, 1995 WL 454004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s candid and well-taken partial confession of error, the denial of rule 3.800 relief below is reversed as to the habitual offender sentence imposed upon the appellant for count three of the information, which charged a life felony. § 775.087(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); see Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). The cause is remanded for resentencing as to that count alone. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s candid and well-taken partial confession of error, the denial of rule 3.800 relief below is reversed as to the habitual offender sentence imposed upon the appellant for count three of the information, which charged a life felony. § 775.087(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); see Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). The cause is remanded for resentencing as to that count alone. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 So. 2d 663, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8278, 1995 WL 454004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaudoin-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack