Beauclerk v. Nyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beauclerk v. Nyer

269 A.D. 652, 53 N.Y.S.2d 50

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D. 652 (Beauclerk v. Nyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beauclerk v. Nyer, 269 A.D. 652, 53 N.Y.S.2d 50 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In view of defendant’s admissions as to his relations with complainant, her counsel should have been afforded ample opportunity to produce the records of the hotels involved. He should also have been permitted reasonable latitude in cross-examining defendant as to the occurrences at these hotels without unnecessary interruption or undue limitation. Upon a new trial there may be a more complete adducement of all pertinent evidence. The order should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In view of defendant’s admissions as to his relations with complainant, her counsel should have been afforded ample opportunity to produce the records of the hotels involved. He should also have been permitted reasonable latitude in cross-examining defendant as to the occurrences at these hotels without unnecessary interruption or undue limitation. Upon a new trial there may be a more complete adducement of all pertinent evidence. The order should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 652, 53 N.Y.S.2d 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beauclerk-v-nyer-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack