Beaubrum v. State
627 So. 2d 137, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12391, 1993 WL 517208
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beaubrum v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 595 So. 2d 254 →
Opinion
The State properly confesses error as to the second ground raised in the appellant’s motion. See Wright v. State, 600 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The appellant’s sentence imposed for his conviction under Count II of the information is hereby vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing to a term of imprisonment not to exceed 40 years. The denial of the motion for post-conviction relief in regard to ground I and II is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beaubrum v. State, 627 So. 2d 137, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12391, 1993 WL 517208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
627 So. 2d 137 (Beaubrum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. State
600 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)