Beaubrum v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Beaubrum v. State

616 So. 2d 9, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 80, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 73, 1993 WL 8937

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1993

DocketNo. 79669

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 9 (Beaubrum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaubrum v. State, 616 So. 2d 9, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 80, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 73, 1993 WL 8937 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Beaubrum v. State, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).¹ In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash, in part, the decision of the district court in the instant case. Nevertheless, we approve Beaubrum’s sentence. The record in this case reflects that none of the amendments to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, contained in chapter 89-280 affected Beaub-rum’s sentence. Consequently, we approve [10]*10the result of the district court’s decision because Beaubrum’s sentence is not altered by our decision in Johnson.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Beaubrum v. State, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).¹ In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash, in part, the decision of the district court in the instant case. Nevertheless, we approve Beaubrum’s sentence. The record in this case reflects that none of the amendments to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, contained in chapter 89-280 affected Beaub-rum’s sentence. Consequently, we approve [10]*10the result of the district court’s decision because Beaubrum’s sentence is not altered by our decision in Johnson.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 9, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 80, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 73, 1993 WL 8937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaubrum-v-state-fla-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack