Beatty v. Wittekamp
172 S.E. 122, 171 S.C. 326, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 73
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
It appears to the Court that the conclusions of E. Inman, Esq, master in equity for Greenville County, in this cause were correct. His report will be reported, and is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
*343 The judgment of this Court is that the decree of the Circuit Judge, appealed from, be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and the cause remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Greenville County for such further action as shall be necessary to carry out the conclusions of the master.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beatty v. Wittekamp, 172 S.E. 122, 171 S.C. 326, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 73 (S.C. 1933).
172 S.E. 122 (Beatty v. Wittekamp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. State
829 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019)
McMaster v. South Carolina Retirement System
608 S.E.2d 843 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Davidson v. Sandstrom
83 P.3d 648 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2004)
United States v. 9.94 A. OF LAND, IN CITY OF CHARLESTON
51 F. Supp. 478 (E.D. South Carolina, 1943)
City of Orangeburg v. Southern Ry. Co.
134 F.2d 890 (Fourth Circuit, 1943)
City of Orangeburg v. Southern Ry. Co.
45 F. Supp. 734 (E.D. South Carolina, 1942)
United States v. City of Greenville
118 F.2d 963 (Fourth Circuit, 1941)
United States v. Woodside
34 F. Supp. 281 (W.D. South Carolina, 1940)