Beatty v. Thomas

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2244

TYRO R. BEATTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SCOTT M. THOMAS, Official Capacity as OIC; MICHAEL A. JONES, individually as Director; NAVSEA INACTIVE SHIP’S MANAGEMENT OFFICE; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND HQ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-05-71-2-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 14, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyro R. Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tyro R. Beatty appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing his

employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Beatty v. Thomas, No. CA-05-71-

2-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. June 15 and Oct. 25, 2005). We deny Beatty’s

motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -