Beatty v. Shiloh

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 15, 2005
• Docket: 04-7667
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7667

JERRY BEATTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN M. SHILOH, General Manager; LAWFORD R. BELL, Operations Manager; ROBERT BECK; UNKNOWN AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES OF STATE USE INDUSTRIES; UNKNOWN AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES OF MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-481-WMN)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Beatty appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Beatty v. Shiloh, No. CA-04-481-WMN (D.

Md. June 8, 2004; Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -