Beatty v. Schwartz, Kauffman & Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Beatty v. Schwartz, Kauffman & Co.

17 La. Ann. 10

DecidedMay 15, 1865

StatusPublished

This text of 17 La. Ann. 10 (Beatty v. Schwartz, Kauffman & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beatty v. Schwartz, Kauffman & Co., 17 La. Ann. 10 (La. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Jones, J.

This is a suit by the holder of a draft against the acceptors. The defence and call in warranty have failed for want of proof. This is evidently an appeal for delay, and as the appellee has, in his answer, prayed damages for frivolous appeal, the same must be allowed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs of appeal, and the sum of one hundred and sixty-eight dollars for frivolous appeal.

Labaove and Hoayeed, J. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones, J.

This is a suit by the holder of a draft against the acceptors. The defence and call in warranty have failed for want of proof. This is evidently an appeal for delay, and as the appellee has, in his answer, prayed damages for frivolous appeal, the same must be allowed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs of appeal, and the sum of one hundred and sixty-eight dollars for frivolous appeal.

Labaove and Hoayeed, J. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 La. Ann. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-schwartz-kauffman-co-la-1865.