Beatty v. Maryland

11 U.S. 281
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Duvall, J.

The account was ,only binding upon the representatives of the éstate, the distributees; and they might still open it in the general Court. But the creditors are no parties1 to the settlement of the account, and cannot be bound by it.

There can be no . doubt that the judgment against the administratrix, the inventory and two first accounts were conclusive evidence of a devastavit.

Marshall, Ch. J.

I believe that is the law throughout the United States.

The Court is unanimously of opinion that the settlement of the account by tlie Orphan’s Court is not conclusivo evidence for the Defendant upon the issue joined.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beatty v. Maryland, 11 U.S. 281 (1812).

11 U.S. 281 (Beatty v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beatty v. The State of Maryland
11 U.S. 281 (Supreme Court, 1812)