Beatty v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.
159 A.D. 917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1913·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Citrone v. O'Rourke Engineering Construction Co. (113 App. Div. 518; 188 N. Y. 339); Russell v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (Id. 344). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beatty v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp., 159 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
159 A.D. 917 (Beatty v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citrone v. O'Rourke Engineering Construction Co.
80 N.E. 1092 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Citrone v. O'Rourke Engineering Construction Co.
113 A.D. 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)