Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.

174 A.D. 867, 159 N.Y.S. 1099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 867 (Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co., 174 A.D. 867, 159 N.Y.S. 1099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by requiring defendant to give security in the sum of $145,000 to secure past and future dividends on the 39,000 shares of stock which are the subject of an option, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the plaintiff has all the security he is entitled to. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by requiring defendant to give security in the sum of $145,000 to secure past and future dividends on the 39,000 shares of stock which are the subject of an option, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the plaintiff has all the security he is entitled to. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 867, 159 N.Y.S. 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-guggenheim-exploration-co-nyappdiv-1916.