Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.

174 A.D. 867, 159 N.Y.S. 1099

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 A.D. 864 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order modified by requiring defendant to give security in the sum of $145,000 to secure past and future dividends on the 39,000 shares of stock which are the subject of an option, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the plaintiff has all the security he is entitled to. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by requiring defendant to give security in the sum of $145,000 to secure past and future dividends on the 39,000 shares of stock which are the subject of an option, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the plaintiff has all the security he is entitled to. Order to be settled on notice.

Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co., 174 A.D. 867, 159 N.Y.S. 1099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

174 A.D. 867 (Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.