Beatty v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Beatty v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 271, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 415

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 4, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 124

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 106 A. 303 (Beatty v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beatty v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 271, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 415 (Pa. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Under the undisputed facts in this case, set forth in the opinion of the learned court below denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, Dunlap, a chauffeur of the defendant company, was clearly not upon his master’s business, but on business or pleasure purely of his own, when the truck he was driving collided with the automobile in which the appellants were passengers, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Under the undisputed facts in this case, set forth in the opinion of the learned court below denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, Dunlap, a chauffeur of the defendant company, was clearly not upon his master’s business, but on business or pleasure purely of his own, when the truck he was driving collided with the automobile in which the appellants were passengers, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A. 303, 263 Pa. 271, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-firestone-tire-rubber-co-pa-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack