Beatty v. Curtis

4 Ky. Op. 673, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 136
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 22, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ky. Op. 673 (Beatty v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beatty v. Curtis, 4 Ky. Op. 673, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 136 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Peters:

It appears from tbe amended petition that Artbusa Beatty was at tbe time sbe executed tbe note, and still is, tbe wife of Decater Beatty, and by reason of her disability tbe writing was not obligatory on her, and as to Decatur eBatty it is not alleged that be executed tbe note, or was in any way bound for tbe debt, and no cause of action is shown to exist against him. And the mere agreement of Oldham did not authorize a judgment against Beatty and wife.

Wherefore, as to Beatty and wife, tbe judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded, with directions to dismiss tbe action as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ky. Op. 673, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatty-v-curtis-kyctapp-1872.