Beatty v. Clinton

772 S.W.2d 619, 299 Ark. 547, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 17, 1989·No. 89-195·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is dismissed because it is not shown to involve an appealable order, the record is insufficient, and it appears that the parties are asking us for an advisory opinion.

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to proceed further in the trial court.

Newbern, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beatty v. Clinton, 772 S.W.2d 619, 299 Ark. 547, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 376 (Ark. 1989).

772 S.W.2d 619 (Beatty v. Clinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smedley v. Smedley
892 S.W.2d 273 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Waldrip v. Davis
842 S.W.2d 49 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1992)
Holsum Shipley Baking Co. v. Terwilliger
819 S.W.2d 303 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1991)