Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly

74 N.W. 1065, 54 Neb. 592, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 126
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1898·No. No. 8044·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Harrison, O. J.

Action to foreclose a real estate mortgage in which the appellee by cross-petition sought the foreclosure of a mortgage on the property involved, and from a decree favorable to his prayer certain of the parties have perfected this appeal. What is filed with the record here as the bill of exceptions lacks the requisite authentication By the clerk of the trial district court and will not be examined. (See Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb. 198; Spurk v. Dean, 49 Neb. 66; Childerson v. Childerson, 47 Neb. 162.)

The cross-petition was sufficient in its statements of facts and prayer to warrant the relief, for which as to it there was a decree, and in the absence of a proper bill of exceptions we cannot examine the questions presented [593] by the brief of counsel. (Stuart v. Burcham, 50 Neb. 823.) The decree must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly, 74 N.W. 1065, 54 Neb. 592, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 126 (Neb. 1898).

74 N.W. 1065 (Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDaniel v. McDaniel
269 N.W. 380 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1936)
Raymond v. Smith
259 N.W. 522 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1935)
Patterson v. Kerr
254 N.W. 704 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)