Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly

74 N.W. 1065, 54 Neb. 592, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 126
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedApril 21, 1898
DocketNo. 8044
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 N.W. 1065 (Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly, 74 N.W. 1065, 54 Neb. 592, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 126 (Neb. 1898).

Opinion

Harrison, O. J.

Action to foreclose a real estate mortgage in which the appellee by cross-petition sought the foreclosure of a mortgage on the property involved, and from a decree favorable to his prayer certain of the parties have perfected this appeal. What is filed with the record here as the bill of exceptions lacks the requisite authentication By the clerk of the trial district court and will not be examined. (See Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb. 198; Spurk v. Dean, 49 Neb. 66; Childerson v. Childerson, 47 Neb. 162.)

The cross-petition was sufficient in its statements of facts and prayer to warrant the relief, for which as to it there was a decree, and in the absence of a proper bill of exceptions we cannot examine the questions presented [593]*593by the brief of counsel. (Stuart v. Burcham, 50 Neb. 823.) The decree must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDaniel v. McDaniel
269 N.W. 380 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1936)
Raymond v. Smith
259 N.W. 522 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1935)
Patterson v. Kerr
254 N.W. 704 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 N.W. 1065, 54 Neb. 592, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beatrice-savings-bank-v-beatrice-chautauqua-assembly-neb-1898.