Beaton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beaton v. State

702 So. 2d 646, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507, 1997 WL 795222

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 1997

DocketNo. 96-4032

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 702 So. 2d 646 (Beaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaton v. State, 702 So. 2d 646, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507, 1997 WL 795222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Beaton, who was convicted of attempted burglary of a dwelling, appeals his sentence based on his claim that the trial court erred in allowing the state to bolster the victim’s identification on voir dire and direct examination. He concedes, however, that his attorney failed to raise objections to such comments below. As he failed to prop[647]*647erly preserve these arguments for appellate review, we affirm.

POLEN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Beaton, who was convicted of attempted burglary of a dwelling, appeals his sentence based on his claim that the trial court erred in allowing the state to bolster the victim’s identification on voir dire and direct examination. He concedes, however, that his attorney failed to raise objections to such comments below. As he failed to prop[647]*647erly preserve these arguments for appellate review, we affirm.

POLEN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 So. 2d 646, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507, 1997 WL 795222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaton-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack