Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.
494 F.2d 516, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1974
DocketNo. 73-3803
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 494 F.2d 516 (Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc., 494 F.2d 516, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468 (5th Cir. 1974).
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in permitting counsel for plaintiff to make a “unit of time” argument in the final portion of his closing argument. All of the protective features required by Baron Tube Co. v. Transport Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F. 2d 858 (en banc), were employed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maude Lanham v. Tom Whitfield, Individually and as Sheriff of Columbia County, Georgia
805 F.2d 970 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
494 F.2d 516, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beason-v-brock-blevins-inc-ca5-1974.