Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.
494 F.2d 516, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 24, 1974·No. No. 73-3803·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in permitting counsel for plaintiff to make a “unit of time” argument in the final portion of his closing argument. All of the protective features required by Baron Tube Co. v. Transport Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F. 2d 858 (en banc), were employed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc., 494 F.2d 516, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468 (5th Cir. 1974).
494 F.2d 516 (Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maude Lanham v. Tom Whitfield, Individually and as Sheriff of Columbia County, Georgia
805 F.2d 970 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)