Beason, Demetrius
This text of Beason, Demetrius (Beason, Demetrius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,764-01
EX PARTE DEMETRIUS BEASON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W16-52471-M(A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam. YEARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment.
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was denied due process when, through no fault of his own, the
trial court lost jurisdiction to consider him for shock probation. The court advised him on the date
of sentencing that it would consider him for shock probation if he had no issues while in custody for
180 days. Three days before the deadline, Applicant was returned to the trial court for consideration
of release on shock probation. The ADA stated that he would not object to shock probation and he
had spoken with the probation department about the conditions of release. 2
However, without the parties’ or trial court’s knowledge, Applicant was returned to the jail
before the hearing. The hearing was rescheduled for four days later, or the 181st day after
Applicant’s conviction. By then, the trial court had no jurisdiction to grant shock probation. But for
Applicant’s having been returned to jail on the date of the first hearing, the trial court would have
considered him for shock probation.
The State and the trial court concur that Applicant “was removed from the underlying
proceedings by a State actor at no fault of his own” and that Applicant was prevented from
“return[ing] to the trial court in a timely manner at no fault of his own.” They recommend granting
relief.
Relief is granted. The sentence in cause number F16-52471-M in the 194th District Court
of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas
County for a new punishment hearing on the revocation of his deferred adjudication. The trial court
shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: June 28, 2023 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Beason, Demetrius, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beason-demetrius-texcrimapp-2023.