Beasley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beasley v. State

549 S.W.3d 539

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105753

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 549 S.W.3d 539 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beasley v. State, 549 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *540setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *540setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

549 S.W.3d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack