Beasley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beasley v. State

549 S.W.3d 539

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2018·No. No. ED 105753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *540setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *540setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Beasley v. State, 549 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

549 S.W.3d 539 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related