Beasley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Beasley v. State

188 S.E. 543, 54 Ga. App. 544, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 694

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 18, 1936

Docket25635

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 543 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beasley v. State, 188 S.E. 543, 54 Ga. App. 544, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 694 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The accused was convicted in Worth County of abandoning his minor children in that county. The undisputed evidence shows that the abandonment, if any, occurred in Mitchell County, and that the defendant did not send his wife and children into Worth County, but that the wife herself arranged for the removal into Worth County of herself and children, and that after such removal the defendant never, in Worth County, renewed his parental obligations to his children. There was no evidence to show that there were any exigencies of the wife’s condition which required her to take the children from Mitchell County into Worth County. The fact that she might have been required or forced to leave their home, which was in Mitchell County, does not necessarily mean that she was required or forced to leave Mitchell County. See Bennefield v. State, 80 Ga. 107 (4 S. E. 869); Cleveland v. State, 7 Ga. App. 622 (57 S. E. 696); Ware v. State, 7 Ga. App. 797 (68 S. E. 443); Gay v. State, 105 Ga. 599 (31 S. E. 569, 70 Am. St. R. 68); Brock v. State, 51 Ga. App. 414 (180 S. E. 644); Pickren v. State, 52 Ga. App. 78 (182 S. E. 423). Under the evidence adduced, the venue of the offense was in Mitchell County, the courts of Worth County had no jurisdiction of the case, and the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., com cur. Guerry, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The accused was convicted in Worth County of abandoning his minor children in that county. The undisputed evidence shows that the abandonment, if any, occurred in Mitchell County, and that the defendant did not send his wife and children into Worth County, but that the wife herself arranged for the removal into Worth County of herself and children, and that after such removal the defendant never, in Worth County, renewed his parental obligations to his children. There was no evidence to show that there were any exigencies of the wife’s condition which required her to take the children from Mitchell County into Worth County. The fact that she might have been required or forced to leave their home, which was in Mitchell County, does not necessarily mean that she was required or forced to leave Mitchell County. See Bennefield v. State, 80 Ga. 107 (4 S. E. 869); Cleveland v. State, 7 Ga. App. 622 (57 S. E. 696); Ware v. State, 7 Ga. App. 797 (68 S. E. 443); Gay v. State, 105 Ga. 599 (31 S. E. 569, 70 Am. St. R. 68); Brock v. State, 51 Ga. App. 414 (180 S. E. 644); Pickren v. State, 52 Ga. App. 78 (182 S. E. 423). Under the evidence adduced, the venue of the offense was in Mitchell County, the courts of Worth County had no jurisdiction of the case, and the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., com cur. Guerry, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 543, 54 Ga. App. 544, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-gactapp-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack