Beasley v. State

927 So. 2d 1026, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691, 2006 WL 1168689
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 2006
DocketNo. 1D04-3220
StatusPublished

This text of 927 So. 2d 1026 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. State, 927 So. 2d 1026, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691, 2006 WL 1168689 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See King v. State, 628 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla.1993); Taylor v. State, 640 So.2d 1127, 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“Improper prosecutorial comment is subject to a harmless error analysis, and will give rise to reversal of a conviction only if the comment is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”). See also Proctor v. State, 901 So.2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“[Tjhis court would not be able to address the [scrivener’s] errors because, absent the trial court’s ruling on a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, these errors were not preserved. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003).”).

KAHN, C.J., WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
901 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Russo Corp.
628 So. 2d 486 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)
Taylor v. State
640 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Brannon v. State
850 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
927 So. 2d 1026, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6691, 2006 WL 1168689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.