Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Beasley v. State

Beasley v. State

810 So. 2d 1018, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2002 WL 346421
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2002·No. No. 4D02-56·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file within the time remaining, a properly sworn, legally sufficient amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in the trial court. See Shaw v. State, 654 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA1995).

POLEN, C.J., FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beasley v. State, 810 So. 2d 1018, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2002 WL 346421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

810 So. 2d 1018 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. State
654 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)