Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Beasley v. State

Beasley v. State

810 So. 2d 1018, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2002 WL 346421
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-56
StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1018 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. State, 810 So. 2d 1018, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2002 WL 346421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file within the time remaining, a properly sworn, legally sufficient amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in the trial court. See Shaw v. State, 654 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA1995).

POLEN, C.J., FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. State
654 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1018, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372, 2002 WL 346421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.