Beasley v. State

782 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, 2001 WL 309932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 2001·No. No. 1D00-3503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is an appeal from the summary denial of Appellant John Beasley’s motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Beasley raised three claims in his motion, and we affirm as to claims one and three. As to claim two, this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for fur- • ther proceedings consistent with the requirements of Clay v. State, 750 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

KAHN, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beasley v. State, 782 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, 2001 WL 309932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

782 So. 2d 508 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clay v. State
750 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)