Beasley v. State

782 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, 2001 WL 309932
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-3503
StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 508 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. State, 782 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, 2001 WL 309932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is an appeal from the summary denial of Appellant John Beasley’s motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Beasley raised three claims in his motion, and we affirm as to claims one and three. As to claim two, this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for fur- • ther proceedings consistent with the requirements of Clay v. State, 750 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

KAHN, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clay v. State
750 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 So. 2d 508, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4122, 2001 WL 309932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.