Beasley v. State

695 So. 2d 1313, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7593, 1997 WL 361481
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1587
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 695 So. 2d 1313 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. State, 695 So. 2d 1313, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7593, 1997 WL 361481 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because a public defender’s attorney’s fee was awarded and a lien thereon imposed [1314]*1314without adequate notice and opportunity to be heard, the assessment is stricken. See Neal v. State, 688 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). On remand, the court may consider whether to again impose the assessment, upon compliance with proper procedures. The appealed orders are otherwise affirmed, and the ease is remanded.

MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddox v. State
708 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 So. 2d 1313, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7593, 1997 WL 361481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.