Beasley v. State

13 S.W. 733, 53 Ark. 67, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 65
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 22, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

The bond of Capehart stipulated that he should render himself amenable to all orders and process of, the court, in the prosecution of the charge. On his petition the court ordered him to Ouachita county for trial. His surety, under the terms of his contract, was bound to see to his attendance. Section 2199, Mansfield’s Digest, is directory merely.

The allegation in the answer that the defendant was acquitted, was refuted by other allegations in the answer and the record, which show that the court refused to receive the verdict in the absence of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beasley v. State, 13 S.W. 733, 53 Ark. 67, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 65 (Ark. 1890).

13 S.W. 733 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minor v. State
258 S.W. 121 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1924)
State v. Hazzard
91 N.E. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Havis v. State
37 S.W. 957 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)