Beasley v. State

13 S.W. 733, 53 Ark. 67, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 65
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 22, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 S.W. 733 (Beasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. State, 13 S.W. 733, 53 Ark. 67, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 65 (Ark. 1890).

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

The bond of Capehart stipulated that he should render himself amenable to all orders and process of, the court, in the prosecution of the charge. On his petition the court ordered him to Ouachita county for trial. His surety, under the terms of his contract, was bound to see to his attendance. Section 2199, Mansfield’s Digest, is directory merely.

The allegation in the answer that the defendant was acquitted, was refuted by other allegations in the answer and the record, which show that the court refused to receive the verdict in the absence of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minor v. State
258 S.W. 121 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1924)
State v. Hazzard
91 N.E. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Havis v. State
37 S.W. 957 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.W. 733, 53 Ark. 67, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-state-ark-1890.