Beasley v. Leesville Motor Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Beasley v. Leesville Motor Co.

1 La. App. 219, 1924 La. App. LEXIS 96

DecidedDecember 30, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 1 La. App. 219 (Beasley v. Leesville Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beasley v. Leesville Motor Co., 1 La. App. 219, 1924 La. App. LEXIS 96 (La. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

MOUTON, J.

The McClaren Rubber Company filed a third opposition herein asking judgment for $1561.91, with recognition of a privilege on automobile equipments described in its petition. The district judge rendered judgment in favor, of third opponent for $1183.78, and recognized the privilege claimed. Appellant has made no appeárance in this court, and has filed no brief or complaint suggesting any errors in the judgment. Finding no error after examining the record, the judgment is affirmed, with cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOUTON, J.

The McClaren Rubber Company filed a third opposition herein asking judgment for $1561.91, with recognition of a privilege on automobile equipments described in its petition. The district judge rendered judgment in favor, of third opponent for $1183.78, and recognized the privilege claimed. Appellant has made no appeárance in this court, and has filed no brief or complaint suggesting any errors in the judgment. Finding no error after examining the record, the judgment is affirmed, with cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 La. App. 219, 1924 La. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-leesville-motor-co-lactapp-1924.