Beasley v. Dowdell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Beasley v. Dowdell

91 So. 921, 207 Ala. 709

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 6, 1922·No. 3 Div. 553.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

A re-examination of the former opinion, reported in 205 Ala. 130, 87 South. 18, has satisfied the court of the correctness of the conclusion then reached, and, there being no substantial difference in the evidence, this appeal is affirmed on authority of the former appeal.

ANDERSON, C. J., SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur. McCLELLAN, J., dissents. THOMAS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J.

A re-examination of the former opinion, reported in 205 Ala. 130, 87 South. 18, has satisfied the court of the correctness of the conclusion then reached, and, there being no substantial difference in the evidence, this appeal is affirmed on authority of the former appeal.

ANDERSON, C. J., SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur. McCLELLAN, J., dissents. THOMAS, J., not sitting.

Beasley v. Dowdell, 91 So. 921, 207 Ala. 709 (Ala. 1922).

Pincite

91 So. 921 (Beasley v. Dowdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related