Beary v. Waterview Nursing Care Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beary v. Waterview Nursing Care Center

242 A.D.2d 516, 662 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8575

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 8, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 14, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In this so-called “slip and fall” case, the defendant made out a prima facie case that it did not create the condition which caused the accident or that it did not have actual or constructive no dee of that condition (see, Kane v Human Serv. Ctr., 186 AD2d 539). In his opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment the plaintiff has failed to rebut this showing. Moreover, since there was only hope and speculation as to what additional discovery would uncover, the court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Mazzaferro v Barterama Corp., 218 AD2d 643). Copertino, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 14, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In this so-called “slip and fall” case, the defendant made out a prima facie case that it did not create the condition which caused the accident or that it did not have actual or constructive no dee of that condition (see, Kane v Human Serv. Ctr., 186 AD2d 539). In his opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment the plaintiff has failed to rebut this showing. Moreover, since there was only hope and speculation as to what additional discovery would uncover, the court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Mazzaferro v Barterama Corp., 218 AD2d 643). Copertino, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur!

Beary v. Waterview Nursing Care Center, 242 A.D.2d 516, 662 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

242 A.D.2d 516 (Beary v. Waterview Nursing Care Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related