Beary v. Cullison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beary v. Cullison

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3777

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 683 (Beary v. Cullison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beary v. Cullison, 30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In this proceeding to invalidate petition designating Thomas P. Cullison as a candidate for election to the party position of Male Member of the Republican Party State Committee from the 21st Assembly District, Queens County, in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968, said designee appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 10, 1968, which granted the application and declared the designating petition invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, proceeding dismissed on the merits and the designating petition declared valid. We do not find fraud in this case justifying invalidation of the entire petition. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding to invalidate petition designating Thomas P. Cullison as a candidate for election to the party position of Male Member of the Republican Party State Committee from the 21st Assembly District, Queens County, in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968, said designee appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 10, 1968, which granted the application and declared the designating petition invalid. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, proceeding dismissed on the merits and the designating petition declared valid. We do not find fraud in this case justifying invalidation of the entire petition. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beary-v-cullison-nyappdiv-1968.