Beardsley's Executors v. Root

New York Supreme Court

Beardsley's Executors v. Root

11 Johns. 406

New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1814·Published

Opinion

Beardsley’s Executors against Root.

Where a verconlln^sublion ° of6 Té lob^mld/tbe limited by the sixth rule of Jan. term,1799, as to the time for preparing the case, &c.

THE COURT said, that the sixth rule of January term, 1799, relative to making cases, did not apply where a verdict was taken by consent, subject to the opinion of the court, on a case to be made by the parties; and that the party was not, therefore, confined to the time limited by that rule for preparing his case &C. ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley’s Executors against Root.

Where a verconlln^sublion ° of6 Té lob^mld/tbe limited by the sixth rule of Jan. term,1799, as to the time for preparing the case, &c.

THE COURT said, that the sixth rule of January term, 1799, relative to making cases, did not apply where a verdict was taken by consent, subject to the opinion of the court, on a case to be made by the parties; and that the party was not, therefore, confined to the time limited by that rule for preparing his case &C. ’

Beardsley's Executors v. Root, 11 Johns. 406 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Pincite

11 Johns. 406 (Beardsley's Executors v. Root) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.