Beardsley's Executors v. Root

New York Supreme Court

Beardsley's Executors v. Root

11 Johns. 406

DecidedAugust 15, 1814

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Johns. 406 (Beardsley's Executors v. Root) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beardsley's Executors v. Root, 11 Johns. 406 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

Beardsley’s Executors against Root.

Where a verconlln^sublion ° of6 Té lob^mld/tbe limited by the sixth rule of Jan. term,1799, as to the time for preparing the case, &c.

THE COURT said, that the sixth rule of January term, 1799, relative to making cases, did not apply where a verdict was taken by consent, subject to the opinion of the court, on a case to be made by the parties; and that the party was not, therefore, confined to the time limited by that rule for preparing his case &C. ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley’s Executors against Root.

Where a verconlln^sublion ° of6 Té lob^mld/tbe limited by the sixth rule of Jan. term,1799, as to the time for preparing the case, &c.

THE COURT said, that the sixth rule of January term, 1799, relative to making cases, did not apply where a verdict was taken by consent, subject to the opinion of the court, on a case to be made by the parties; and that the party was not, therefore, confined to the time limited by that rule for preparing his case &C. ’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Johns. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beardsleys-executors-v-root-nysupct-1814.