Beardsley v. Dygert

3 Denio 380
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1846·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the objection is made at this stage of the proceedings, the question is whether the suit belongs to the class of referable causes. It is settled that an action of tort cannot be referred, except under the late statute, where it may be done by consent of all the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley v. Dygert, 3 Denio 380 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

3 Denio 380 (Beardsley v. Dygert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Cuyler
16 Barb. 576 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
McMaster v. Booth
4 How. Pr. 427 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Board of Supervisors v. People ex rel. McMaster & Harvey
7 Hill & Den. 504 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)