Beardsley v. Dygert

New York Supreme Court

Beardsley v. Dygert

3 Denio 380

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1846

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Denio 380 (Beardsley v. Dygert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beardsley v. Dygert, 3 Denio 380 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the objection is made at this stage of the proceedings, the question is whether the suit belongs to the class of referable causes. It is settled that an action of tort cannot be referred, except under the late statute, where it may be done by consent of all the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where the objection is made at this stage of the proceedings, the question is whether the suit belongs to the class of referable causes. It is settled that an action of tort cannot be referred, except under the late statute, where it may be done by consent of all the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Denio 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beardsley-v-dygert-nysupct-1846.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack