Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 533, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248
Opinion
We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.
The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.
As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore, 139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 533, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 723 (Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gram v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
461 N.E.2d 796 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1984)