Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

New York Court of Appeals

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 533, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 N.E. 723 (Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore, 139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 533, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (N.Y. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI