Bearden v. State

175 S.E. 402, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 385
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 9, 1934
Docket24006
StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E. 402 (Bearden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bearden v. State, 175 S.E. 402, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of possessing whisky, and his motion for a new trial embraced only the usual general grounds. While the evidence was conflicting and would have authorized the acquittal of the accused, it also authorized the finding of the jury; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gfuerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 S.E. 402, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bearden-v-state-gactapp-1934.