Bearden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bearden v. State

124 S.E. 811, 32 Ga. App. 779, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 656

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1924

Docket15682

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 S.E. 811 (Bearden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bearden v. State, 124 S.E. 811, 32 Ga. App. 779, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The conviction not being wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, an assignment of error upon the ground that, without request, the court failed to charge the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Eor none of the reasons assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI