Bearden v. State
124 S.E. 811, 32 Ga. App. 779, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 656
Opinion
The conviction not being wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, an assignment of error upon the ground that, without request, the court failed to charge the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit.
The evidence amply authorized the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Eor none of the reasons assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bearden v. State, 124 S.E. 811, 32 Ga. App. 779, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
124 S.E. 811 (Bearden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bostick v. State
130 S.E. 221 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)