Bearden v. Potter

327 F. App'x 414
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 2009
DocketNo. 09-1284
StatusPublished

This text of 327 F. App'x 414 (Bearden v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bearden v. Potter, 327 F. App'x 414 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Russell J. Bearden appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Bearden’s complaint brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (2006), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bearden v. Potter, No. l:08-cv-00864-JCC-TCB, 2009 WL 357988 (E.D.Va. Feb. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2000e-16
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16
§ 2000e
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F. App'x 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bearden-v-potter-ca4-2009.