Bearden v. Armor Mobile Home Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bearden v. Armor Mobile Home Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia

307 So. 2d 866

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1975

DocketNo. 74-707

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 307 So. 2d 866 (Bearden v. Armor Mobile Home Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bearden v. Armor Mobile Home Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia, 307 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a judgment awarding certain damages to the plaintiff, upon a non-jury trial. We hold no reversible error has been shown.

The contention of the appellant that the judgment is contrary to and not supportable on the evidence, is without merit. The trial court made findings of fact upon which the entry of the judgment against the defendant was proper. Having considered the briefs and argument, and examined the record, we are impelled to conclude that the findings of the trial court are not without adequate support by the record. Additional contentions made by the appellant have been considered, and are held not to furnish basis for reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a judgment awarding certain damages to the plaintiff, upon a non-jury trial. We hold no reversible error has been shown.

The contention of the appellant that the judgment is contrary to and not supportable on the evidence, is without merit. The trial court made findings of fact upon which the entry of the judgment against the defendant was proper. Having considered the briefs and argument, and examined the record, we are impelled to conclude that the findings of the trial court are not without adequate support by the record. Additional contentions made by the appellant have been considered, and are held not to furnish basis for reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 So. 2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bearden-v-armor-mobile-home-manufacturing-corp-of-georgia-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack