Beard v. Tuell

Fourth Circuit

Beard v. Tuell

164 F. App'x 438

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2006·No. No. 05-7476·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Fernando Beard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re[439]*439versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Fernando Beard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re[439]*439versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Beard v. Tuell, 164 F. App'x 438 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 438 (Beard v. Tuell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related