Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Beard v. State

Beard v. State

319 S.E.2d 136, 170 Ga. App. 712, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2004
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 19, 1984·No. 67672·Published

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Applying the standard enunciated in Pitts v. Glass, 231 Ga. 638 (203 SE2d 515) (1974), we find no merit in appellant’s allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel, his sole enumeration of error on appeal. See Hawes v. State, 240 Ga. 327 (1) (240 SE2d 833) (1977); Ammons v. State, 168 Ga. App. 601 (309 SE2d 885) (1983); Spence v. State, 163 Ga. App. 198 (1) (292 SE2d 908) (1982). See also Phillips v. State, 169 Ga. App. 801 (2) (315 SE2d 34) (1984).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beard v. State, 319 S.E.2d 136, 170 Ga. App. 712, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2004 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

319 S.E.2d 136 (Beard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitts v. Glass
203 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Hawes v. State
240 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Spence v. State
292 S.E.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Ammons v. State
309 S.E.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Phillips v. State
315 S.E.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)