Beard v. Seals, et.al
This text of Beard v. Seals, et.al (Beard v. Seals, et.al) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEC 2 - 2014
Clerk, U.S. District 8. Bankruptcy
) Courts for the District of Columbia CHARLIE S. BEARD, JR., ) )
Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 14-1035 (RCL) ) v. ) ) KOBIE SEALS, ) ) MICHAEL BARNES, ) ) Defendants. ) __—) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 7] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that defendants made false and defamatory statements which caused plaintiff to suffer economic and emotional harm. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Charlie S. Beard, Jr., plaintiff, Kobie Seals, defendant, and Michael Barnes, defendant, are employees of the Government Printing Office (“GPO”). Compl. 1i 5. Plaintiff was promoted to the position of sergeant and assigned to the midnight shift, in which he worked as defendants’ direct supervisor. Id. at 111] 6-7. Plaintiff had to reprimand defendant Seals for failing to be at his assigned post and because plaintiff suspected defendant Seals was sleeping in vacant offices while on duty. Id. at 1] 7. On March 25, 2013, defendant Seals allegedly went to plaintiff’s office and saw him sleeping at his computer. Id. at 1] 8. Seals then spoke to defendant Barnes
and asked him to witness that plaintiff was sleeping at his desk. Id. at 1} 9. Seals sent a written
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Beard v. Seals, et.al, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beard-v-seals-etal-dcd-2014.