Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 MATHEW BEARD, 6 Case No. 2:23-cv-01060-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 7 ORDER v. 8 9 NEVADA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 It appears that Plaintiff has failed to update his address. Docket Nos. 56-58. “A party, not 12} the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing 13]| address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 14] 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with 15] the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so 16] may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] September 5, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: August 5, 2025
Nancy J. Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections (Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.