Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 5, 2025·No. 2:23-cv-01060·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 MATHEW BEARD, 6 Case No. 2:23-cv-01060-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 7 ORDER v. 8 9 NEVADA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 It appears that Plaintiff has failed to update his address. Docket Nos. 56-58. “A party, not 12} the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing 13]| address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 14] 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with 15] the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so 16] may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] September 5, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: August 5, 2025

Nancy J. Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, (D. Nev. 2025).

Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections (Beard v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory Carey v. John E. King
856 F.2d 1439 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Richard M. Penta
940 F.2d 13 (First Circuit, 1991)