Beard v. Henniker & Hillsborough

39 A. 1016, 69 N.H. 279
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A. 1016 (Beard v. Henniker & Hillsborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beard v. Henniker & Hillsborough, 39 A. 1016, 69 N.H. 279 (N.H. 1897).

Opinion

Chase, J.

The court had authority to permit the amendment to be made. P. S., c. 222, s. 8; Osgood v. Green, 30 N. H. 210; Sawyer v. Keene, 47 N. H. 173. No question affecting the exercise of the authority is reserved.

Exception overruled.

Carpenter, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Pratt
1 Teiss. 3 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A. 1016, 69 N.H. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beard-v-henniker-hillsborough-nh-1897.