Beard v. County of Stanislaus

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 31, 2022
Docket1:21-cv-00841
StatusUnknown

This text of Beard v. County of Stanislaus (Beard v. County of Stanislaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beard v. County of Stanislaus, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-DAD-SAB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 22) 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 23 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 24 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting and defending this litigation 25 may be warranted. 26 Previously, documents from juvenile dependency proceedings involving one or more of 27 the parties hereto have in fact been provided to one or more of the parties in this matter by an 28 order of the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus, and are presumptively confidential. 1 Accordingly, with regard to the documents from said juvenile dependency proceedings, 2 and any other documents/evidence or information which is confidential, proprietary, or private 3 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 4 other than prosecuting and defending this litigation may be warranted, the parties do hereby 5 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 6 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 7 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 8 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 9 treatment under the applicable legal principles, and that the burden of proof in the event of a 10 dispute shall be on the party seeking to designate documents/evidence or items as confidential. 11 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 12 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; the Local 13 Rules of this Court set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will 14 be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal and nothing 15 in this Order preempts that procedure. 16 2. DEFINITIONS 17 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 18 information or items under this Order. 19 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 20 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 22 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 23 well as their support staff). 24 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 25 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 26 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 27 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 28 /// 1 things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures 2 or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 4 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 5 a consultant in this action. 6 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 7 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 8 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 9 entity not named as a Party to this action. 10 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 11 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this 12 action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 13 that party. 14 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 15 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 16 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 17 Material in this action. 18 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 19 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 20 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 21 subcontractors. 22 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 23 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 25 Producing Party. 26 3. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 28 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 1 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) 2 any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal 3 Protected Material. 4 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 5 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of 6 disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a 7 Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including 8 becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known 9 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the 10 disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of 11 confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be 12 governed by a separate agreement or order. 13 4. DURATION 14 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 15 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a 16 court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal 17 of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment 18 herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or 19 reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for 20 extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 21 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 22 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 23 Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must 24 take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 25 standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, 26 documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the 27 material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not 28 swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized 1 designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have 2 been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case 3 development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose 4 the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that 5 information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that 6 Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken 7 designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Beard v. County of Stanislaus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beard-v-county-of-stanislaus-caed-2022.