Beard v. City of Atlanta

83 S.E.2d 594, 211 Ga. 25, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 459
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 13, 1954
Docket18670
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 83 S.E.2d 594 (Beard v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beard v. City of Atlanta, 83 S.E.2d 594, 211 Ga. 25, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1954).

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

The exception here is to the refusal of the trial judge in the superior court to sanction and allow a petition for certiorari, in a case which was tried in the Municipal Court of Atlanta, wherein an attack was made upon the constitutionality of an ordinance of the City of Atlanta designated as Chapter 7, Barbers, Sections 7.1 through 7.38, of the 1953 Code of the City of Atlanta. Held:

1. “The Court of Appeals, and not the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction of a writ of error brought to review the ruling of the superior court in refusing to grant a certiorari which sought to set aside a conviction, in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta, of violation of an ordinance of said city. This result is not altered by the fact that the only defense presented was an attack on the constitutionality of the ordinance.” Bunn v. City of Atlanta, 192 Ga. 682 (16 S. E. 2d 539).

2. The present case involves the constitutionality of an ordinance of the City of Atlanta; and since no other question is involved which under article 6, section 2, paragraph 4, of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-3704), would confer jurisdiction on the Supreme Court, it is transferred to the Court of Appeals. Loomis v. City of Atlanta, 206 Ga. 822 (58 S. E. 2d 813); Shipman v. Johnson, 210 Ga. 174 (78 S. E. 2d 515).

3. The case of Forbes v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 160 Ga. 701 (2) (128 S. E. 806), relied on by counsel for the plaintiff in error as conferring upon this court jurisdiction of the present writ of error, was expressly overruled in Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (2) (187 S. E. 699).

Transfened to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowery Savings Bank v. DeKalb County
236 S.E.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Davis
159 S.E.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Davis
157 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
City of Columbus v. Atlanta Cigar Co.
140 S.E.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Rogers v. MAYOR & BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA
136 S.E.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Meeks v. Lunsford
126 S.E.2d 531 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Ledbetter v. Roberts
96 S.E.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Perkins v. Hattiesburg Brick Work
96 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E.2d 594, 211 Ga. 25, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beard-v-city-of-atlanta-ga-1954.