Beard v. Alvis
This text of 164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488 (Beard v. Alvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner bases his right to release on the sole claim that he was denied a fair trial because of the ineffective and inadequate representation by counsel appointed by the court, and that, therefore, he was denied due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution.
There is no question as to the trial court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of petitioner.
The petition contains no allegation of fact which entitles petitioner to the relief sought. The relief prayed for is denied.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beard-v-alvis-ohio-1956.