Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Riddell

Ninth Circuit

Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Riddell

427 F.2d 713

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 4, 1970·No. Nos. 23411, 23486·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The government concedes that the underlying facts in these cases are indistinguishable from those before our court in Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 321 F.2d 253. (Certiorari not sought.) We affirm on the basis of that decision.

It is here noted that the Anaheim problem apparently goes away with legislation to become effective January, 1971. See Public Law 91-172, 83 Stat. 487.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The government concedes that the underlying facts in these cases are indistinguishable from those before our court in Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 321 F.2d 253. (Certiorari not sought.) We affirm on the basis of that decision.

It is here noted that the Anaheim problem apparently goes away with legislation to become effective January, 1971. See Public Law 91-172, 83 Stat. 487.

Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Riddell, 427 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

427 F.2d 713 (Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Riddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related